Sometimes it seems that social primates are becoming too smart for their britches.
— George Maclaine Lang (@xerxesxerxes) January 2, 2021
So we've all become talking heads now.#Zoom
— George Maclaine Lang (@xerxesxerxes) December 27, 2020

Carnet intime
Sometimes it seems that social primates are becoming too smart for their britches.
— George Maclaine Lang (@xerxesxerxes) January 2, 2021
So we've all become talking heads now.#Zoom
— George Maclaine Lang (@xerxesxerxes) December 27, 2020
Xuefei Yang playing Roland Dyens arrangement of “The Moon Represents My Heart”
Han Eun’s version: https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=aaplw&p=dyens+the+moon+represets+my+heart#id=1&vid=27ff1d7cb20ac46468c8512931513eb1&action=click
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Moon_Represents_My_Heart
Teresa Tang’s version, with sing-along lyrics.
YoYo; Chinese lesson: https://www.yoyochinese.com/blog/learn-chinese-through-song-moon-represents-my-heart
*
You ask me how much I love you
你問我愛你有多深 我愛你有幾分
Nǐ wèn wǒ ài nǐ yǒu duō shēn wǒ ài nǐ yǒu jǐ fēn
My love is also true My love is also true
我的情也真 我的愛也真
wǒ de qíng yě zhēn wǒ de ài yě zhēn
the moon represents my heart
月亮代表我的心
yuèliàng dàibiǎo wǒ de xīn
You ask me how much I love you
你問我愛你有多深 我愛你有幾分
Nǐ wèn wǒ ài nǐ yǒu duō shēn wǒ ài nǐ yǒu jǐ fēn
My love does not change, my love does not change
我的情不移 我的愛不變
wǒ de qíng bù yí wǒ de ài bù biàn
the moon represents my heart
月亮代表我的心
yuèliàng dàibiǎo wǒ de xīn
A soft kiss has touched my heart
輕輕的一個吻 已經打動我的心
Qīng qīng de yīgè wěn yǐjīng dǎdòng wǒ de xīn
A deep love that taught me to miss until now
深深的一段情 教我思念到如今
shēn shēn de yīduàn qíng jiào wǒ sīniàn dào rújīn
You ask me how much I love you
你問我愛你有多深 我愛你有幾分
Nǐ wèn wǒ ài nǐ yǒu duō shēn wǒ ài nǐ yǒu jǐ fēn
Think about it, go take a look
你去想一想 你去看一看
nǐ qù xiǎng yī xiǎng nǐ qù kàn yī kàn
the moon represents my heart
月亮代表我的心
yuèliàng dàibiǎo wǒ de xīn
A soft kiss has touched my heart
輕輕的一個吻 已經打動我的心
Qīng qīng de yīgè wěn yǐjīng dǎdòng wǒ de xīn
A deep love that taught me to miss until now
深深的一段情 教我思念到如今
shēn shēn de yīduàn qíng jiào wǒ sīniàn dào rújīn
You ask me how much I love you
你問我愛你有多深 我愛你有幾分
Nǐ wèn wǒ ài nǐ yǒu duō shēn wǒ ài nǐ yǒu jǐ fēn
Think about it, go take a look
你去想一想 你去看一看
nǐ qù xiǎng yī xiǎng nǐ qù kàn yī kàn
the moon represents my heart
月亮代表我的心
yuèliàng dàibiǎo wǒ de xīn
Think about it, go take a look
你去想一想 你去看一看
Nǐ qù xiǎng yī xiǎng nǐ qù kàn yī kàn
the moon represents my heart
月亮代表我的心
yuèliàng dàibiǎo wǒ de xīn
Race is an emic, not etic concept. In other words, it is in the minds of the beholders, nor an objective fact.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emic_and_etic
In anthropology, folkloristics, and the social and behavioral sciences, emic and etic refer to two kinds of field research done and viewpoints obtained:[1] emic, from within the social group from the perspective of the subject) and etic, from outside (from the perspective of the observer.
*
„Die einzige Art und Weise den rassistischen Fimmel anzugreifen, der die Welt heutzutage mitreisst, ist seine angeblich wissenschaftliche Basis zu untergraben“.[105]
Boas, qtd in Friedrich Pöhl, Oswald Spenglers Rassebegriff im Kontext seiner Zeit: Boas, Chamberlain, Lenz, Rosenberg, Sombart
The false piety of white #liberals who claim that they are not #racists — or, indeed, who mea culpa that they ARE racists — is matched by the epistemological arrogance of the #CRT #Woke, who insist that everyone else is. And that they are not.
— George Lang (@geogeoplots) April 14, 2021
Brooks on Recent Books Touching on Liberalism:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/24/opinion/sidney-awards-2020.html
Francis Fukuyama wrote “Liberalism and Its Discontents” in American Purpose, which is the best single primer to the long-running debate about the liberal order.
“Classical liberalism can best be understood as an institutional solution to the problem of governing over diversity,” Fukuyama writes. It does this by “deliberately not specifying higher goals of human life.” It leaves people free to decide their own values, their own form of worship. Liberalism is thus perpetually unsatisfying to those trying to build a perfectly just or virtuous society because it is neutral about many ultimate concerns. There’s a void that often gets filled with consumerism.”
*
2PR or Not-To-P [GL]:
The contradiction between domestic- and foreign-focused becomes clearer when one recognizes that liberals do not apply the same ultimate-judgment-free standard outside of their own societies. The right to protect, that is to invade other countries (R2P), is in fact based on deliberately specifying higher goals and values, e.g. that democracy as practiced in the “West” is inherently superior to other forms of governance.
*
Tara Isabella Burton takes the argument one level deeper in her essay “Postliberal Epistemology” in Comment. Liberalism, she argues, was based on a view of the human person now being rejected on left and right. A person, Enlightenment liberalism holds, is essentially rational and disembodied. If people use reason properly, they will come to the same logical results.
For more and more millennials, in particular, she argues, this view is insufficient: “In rendering human rationality disembodied, it also renders human beings interchangeable, reproducible, not incarnations but instantiations of a vague generic.”
Continuing correspondance ….
*
Charlie Pride. Now that’s name I haven’t heard for a while. Thx for the link. San Antone is indeed the name of the place. My Granny, an inveterate racist, was born there.
You are absolutely right that a hypothetical mauvaise foi / victimization CRT (critical race theory) argument about Cobden fans of Pride would be silly.
The problem with the woke CRT approach is that its audience is only a narrow subsection of white society: those who already feel guilty. The ones who do not are and will be impervious to it. And those whites who have already thought or felt their way through the indeniable racism of the wider society will eventually dismiss the woke elect as self-righteous and, well, as silly. Which attitude is already beginning to spread. Shit, even AOC is giving cooking lessons.
I did watch the latest Glenn Show and noticed John’s new posture, which I doubt he’ll pursue for long. Empathy is one of his prime characteristics but I share your discomfort with his line of thought. Not so much because of whatever he or Glenn might say about “Omar”, a Straw Man if ever there was one, but also about Jefferson, who was also serving on this occasion as a kind of Straw Man. Telling about relatively conventional and pious-thinking Glenn was his remark about Sally Hemmings and her/their children.
How could he, TJ, have done that to his children? I think Glenn meant not only “made” them but then thought of them as chattel. But that’s what children were in general. Forget the “Enlightenment”, which is an intellectual construct for the … pious white privileged.
First of all, such a remark depends upon a culturally specific position, a contemporary one. Let’s leave race aside for a sec. We are talking about a man, TJ, whose behaviour was shaped two and a half centuries ago, one whom we, that is Glenn, is judging on the basis of some Xtianized view of the nuclear family, dare I say on some US 50s vision of family life, more white Leave It To Beaver than deep Black family values but still …
Moreover, anyone with a shred of self-knowledge will have to own up to the subterranean appeal of fucking a slave, and the forms of desire and, yes, love that might engender. The Latin poets, in particular Propertius, were elegant on the delights of owning or even being a slave in sex/love. Is it too much to ask that Glenn in particular be aware of the 1000 varieties of love outside the local culture of his life span?
(Let me mention in passing that one recent local UCI quandry is what to do with the “rapes” in Ovid in a survey course. The jerk-knee response is to cancel him from the curriculum, but some folks think trigger warnings will do. No further comment.)
What really gets me is how narrow a view of human nature these folks, both woke and anti-woke, have. For the record, I don’t think the right, alt or not, is any better.
Glad you are able to connect with the SB students. I bet more of them than the local Francos would entertain the joys of love in/as bondage. Though some of the Africans, north or not, might have a glimmer, though they know the rules here and would not own up to it.
On the implied contrast between European and N American educational standards, I recently provided some notes to a grad student at Aix, whose is writing on a Haitian novelist whom I met and glancingly wrote on. http://ile-en-ile.org/roger-dorsinville-preface/
Sure, it’s about “third world lit” and hence about race in some sense or another, but I was struck by the thorough, detailed and probingly professional nature of her questions, totally diff from what serves as critical thinking on this side of the pond.
I’m currently reading Lucretius in Alicia Stallings’ rhyming translation, which led me back to Stephen Greenblatt’s The Swerve, which turns around a 15th c. Italian humanist’s tracking down of the single extant mss of De rerum natura. Prob affected my ref to Propertius above and shaped my thinking on this morning ‘s rather pessimistic but intentionally provocative tweet. https://twitter.com/geogeoplots/status/1338189211027959810?s=21
Bravo for wine deliveries. I get one a month from Kermit Lynch nd occasionally from another shop I know of in Berkeley.
It’s finally early winter, quince season, but instead of making the standard Persian beef-quince stew, tomorrow I’m gonna whomp up a cinnamon- and tumeric-laced Moroccan tagine of chicken, caramelized quince and toasted walnuts, with copious garlic and harissa.
Cheers,
George