Recent Posts

As I did previously for Calculating Machine: A Villanelle, I fed a recent poem, Freezing: A Triolet for a PwP, into DeepSeek, a Chinese LLM bot in the news lately. It came up with the following brilliant, IMHO, analysis.

DeepSeek on “Freezing: Triolet for a PwP”

1. Context: “PwP”

PwP is standard shorthand for Person with Parkinson’s. This immediately situates the poem in the specific, physical reality of Parkinson’s disease, rather than just metaphorical “feeling stuck.”

2. Form: The Triolet as a Symptom

The choice of the triolet is a masterstroke of enactment—the form performs the content.

· Structure: 8 lines, with Line 1 repeated at Line 4 and Line 7. Line 2 repeated at Line 8.

· The Loop: Parkinson’s “Freezing of Gait” is a phenomenon where the patient’s feet feel glued to the floor while the upper body continues moving forward (often leading to falls). The poem’s repeating refrain—”Caught in an endless loop”—is a precise literary echo of the brain’s motor circuit failing to fire.

· Frustration of the Form: A triolet is strict and claustrophobic. You are forced to return to the same line whether you want to or not. The poem cannot “move forward” from Line 1 any more than the speaker’s feet can.

3. Line-by-Line Poetic Analysis

“Caught in an endless loop”

The immediate, visceral identification of the problem. “Caught” implies a trap outside one’s will.

“I try to move forward but can’t.”

Brutally straightforward. There is no decorative language here because the reality is stark. The enjambment (or lack of a comma) rushes into the next line, mimicking a lurch.

“Why this slumping stoop?”

A direct reference to Camptocormia or postural instability, a classic symptom of PD where the spine curves forward involuntarily.

“Out of step from the group”

Parkinson’s often robs the patient of the internal metronome. They cannot match the rhythm of others walking beside them. There is a deep social isolation in this line—being physically present but temporally out of sync.

“Things always go so askant.”

Askant is a less common variant of “askance” (sidelong, awry, crooked).

Poetic effect: The word itself is slightly off, slightly “slumping” in its spelling. It suggests the world tilting sideways as balance fails.

4. The Inversion of the Final Line

A triolet usually repeats Line 2 exactly: “I try to move forward but can’t.”

However, notice the punctuation shift in the presentation here:

· Line 2: I try to move forward but can’t. (End stop. Full failure.)

· Line 8: I try to move forward but can’t.

Actually, looking closer at the provided text, the punctuation is identical. However, the context of Line 8 is different. By the time we reach Line 8, we have been through the loop once. The repetition is no longer a statement; it is a wearied sigh. The poem has proven that trying and failing is the only reality.

5. Conclusion

This is an excellent example of somatic poetry—poetry that translates bodily experience directly into formal structure. The triolet does not just describe freezing; it simulates the neurological loop of the basal ganglia. The poem cannot escape Line 1, just as the PwP cannot escape the freeze.

– Memories of a life well lived are most agreeable

The best thing about dying slowly, which I consider myself so far lucky enough to be able to do, is that the flash of poignant moments from your past life you allegedly see when you die is spread out over a longer while.

How long remains unknown to most of us. Even PD does not confer this knowledge. “Most people die with it,” my first neurologist told me, “rather than from it”–presumably, by way of reassurance.

PD imparts a sort  of lucidity about dying.  It also masks the effects of aging, which is proceeding in the normal way  at the same time that one’s nervous system is eroding. The patient tends to forget that many symptoms of PD, unsteadiness of gait, fatigue, weakness of the legs, incontinence, loss of dexterity, et cetera et cetera, are shared and suffered by all old folks

You too will be replaced.

As stimulus I fed Calculating  Machine into DeepSeek, the Chinese LLM bot.

Within nanoseconds it spat out the following stellar 9.5/10 response :

DeepSeek’s Analysis of “Calculating Machine: A Villanelle” by George Lang

This poem adapts the villanelle form—traditionally used for pastoral or obsessive meditations—into a forceful anti-war polemic. The form’s insistent repetitions become a kind of legal indictment, hammering home its central accusations.

Form and Function

The villanelle is a nineteen-line form with two repeating refrains and a strict rhyme scheme (ABA ABA ABA ABA ABA ABAA). Lang adheres to this structure precisely:

Rhyme scheme: The A-words are crime, time, sublime, pantomime, grime, slime, paradigm, screams, crime, time. The B-words are means, genes, scenes, teens, machines.

The form’s built-in repetition serves the poem’s argument: the refrains function like a prosecutor’s closing statement or a protest chant, insisting on the same points until they become inescapable.

The Refrains as Argument

The two refrains evolve across the poem:

Refrain 1: “Isn’t war itself a crime?” → “war itself becomes a crime” → “War itself is war crime”

This progression moves from question to assertion to absolute declaration. By the final stanza, the tentative “isn’t” has hardened into the definitive “is,” and “war crime” appears as a compound noun rather than a description.

Refrain 2: “Shouldn’t villains waging war do time?” → “are waging war. They should do time” → “Those who wage it must do time”

This shifts from rhetorical question (“Shouldn’t…”) to active present tense (“are waging”) to imperative (“must do”). The legal and moral obligation intensifies with each appearance.

Thematic Structure

The poem makes a coherent argument across its six stanzas:

Stanza Function

1 Thesis: Poses the central moral questions

2 Refutation: Rejects biological determinism (“Nor is it in our genes”)

3 Indictment: Names hidden actors (“Villains behind the scenes”)

4 Evidence: Presents civilian casualties as proof (“bury under rubble…enfants”)

5 Prosecution: Identifies the perpetrators (“pernicious slime who drive the calculating machines”)

6 Verdict: Concludes with definitive judgment

Key Lexical Choices

“Calculating machines” functions on two levels:

1. Literal military technology—computers, drones, targeting systems that conduct modern warfare

2. Metaphorical—the cold, rationalizing mindset that reduces human lives to acceptable losses in strategic equations

“Villains” / “pernicious slime” : The language grows increasingly visceral, moving from the somewhat comic-book “villains” to the visceral disgust of “slime.” This escalation mirrors the poem’s hardening moral stance.

“Enfants, children, teens” : The tricolon (three-part list) emphasizes the vulnerability of the young. Using French “enfants” alongside English synonyms universalizes the victims—these are not “collateral damage” but specific human beings across languages and borders.

The Broken Pattern at the End

In a traditional villanelle, the final quatrain ends with both refrains in succession. Lang follows this but introduces a crucial variation:

“War itself is war crime.

Those who wage it must do time.”

The expected rhyme “crime/time” appears, but the line “War the very paradigm / of death: destruction, carnage, screams” introduces an internal rupture. The colon and the piled nouns (“destruction, carnage, screams”) break the metrical flow, as if the horror of war cannot be contained by the poem’s formal elegance. The final couplet restores order, but only after this moment of chaos—mirroring the poem’s argument that justice must follow atrocity.

Rhetorical Strategy

The poem operates primarily through erotesis (rhetorical questions that imply their own answers). The opening “Isn’t war itself a crime?” and “Do ends ever justify the means?” are not genuine inquiries but statements in interrogative form. By the end, these questions have been answered so definitively that they no longer need question marks.

This technique places the reader in the position of a jury—we are not asked to debate but to recognize what we already know.

Critical Perspective

The poem’s strength lies in its formal control and moral clarity. Its potential limitation is that the villanelle’s repetitions, when yoked to such an unambiguous message, can feel less like discovery and more like a hammer. The poem does not explore ambiguity or complexity—it prosecutes. For readers who share its premises, this is cathartic; for those seeking nuance, it may feel didactic. That said, the poem’s formal accomplishment—turning a form associated with Dylan Thomas’s “Do not go gentle into that good night” toward political indictment—represents genuine craft. 

 

My paternal  grandfather, John P. Lang, in an atypical suit. We called him Bunco, as in bunk. The other cousins called him Poh-Poh. He was marvelous man, full  of not bunk but quirks and wisdom.

 

 

 

 

 

 

My maternal grandfather, George L. Maclaine, whom I never knew. He died in 1929 in a tram accident in the Houston Heights (elevation 90′), leaving my grandmother, née Ann Terese Masterson, to raise their three children during the Depression.

He was the first Maclaine “ghost” I  never knew. The second was his son George Maclaine, who died in 1944 during WW2, after whom I was named and about whom I wrote in Delayed Reaction (link in bio)